Le samedi 02 mars 2019 à 17:17 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior a écrit :
> On 2019-03-02 11:54:54 [+0100], Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > Le samedi 02 mars 2019 à 11:26 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior a écrit :
> > >
> > > So if the bug is really in libssl1.1 then I don't see why you should do
>
On 2019-03-02 11:54:54 [+0100], Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Le samedi 02 mars 2019 à 11:26 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior a écrit :
> >
> > So if the bug is really in libssl1.1 then I don't see why you should do
> > something. I will try to backport that commit then and make a new
> > upload.
>
Le samedi 02 mars 2019 à 11:26 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior a écrit :
>
> So if the bug is really in libssl1.1 then I don't see why you should do
> something. I will try to backport that commit then and make a new
> upload.
Note that the bug has already been fixed in Debian (r-cran-openssl
1.
On 2019-03-01 23:55:11 [+0100], Jeroen Ooms wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 8:05 PM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2019-03-01 11:16:35 [+0100], Jeroen Ooms wrote:
> > > FWIW, the underlying problem in a regression in libssl though. So if
> > > the problem appears for other packages
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 8:05 PM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
>
> On 2019-03-01 11:16:35 [+0100], Jeroen Ooms wrote:
> > FWIW, the underlying problem in a regression in libssl though. So if
> > the problem appears for other packages you could also backport this
> > libssl patch: https://github.c
On 2019-03-01 11:16:35 [+0100], Jeroen Ooms wrote:
> FWIW, the underlying problem in a regression in libssl though. So if
> the problem appears for other packages you could also backport this
> libssl patch: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/8375
Does this problem solve your problem or doe
clone 923447 -1
reassign 923447 src:r-cran-openssl 1.2.1+dfsg-1
retitle 923447 r-cran-openssl needs update for new openssl
reassign -1 src:openssl 1.1.1b-1
retitle -1 openssl: regression in memory problems with BUF_MEM
affects -1 src:r-cran-openssl
tags -1 upstream patch
forwarded -1 https://github
FWIW, the underlying problem in a regression in libssl though. So if
the problem appears for other packages you could also backport this
libssl patch: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/8375
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 10:59 AM Jeroen Ooms wrote:
>
> I have submitted a hotfix release openss
I have submitted a hotfix release openssl 1.2.2 to cran that should
fix the issue. It should be there soon.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 5:24 PM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd be deligted if somebody from the team could care since I'm
> basically offline-ish until 4.3.
>
> Thank you, Andreas.
Hi,
I'd be deligted if somebody from the team could care since I'm
basically offline-ish until 4.3.
Thank you, Andreas.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:29:12PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: openssl, r-cran-openssl
> Control: found -1 openssl/1.1.1b-1
> Control: found -1 r-cran-openssl/1.2.1+dfs
Source: openssl, r-cran-openssl
Control: found -1 openssl/1.1.1b-1
Control: found -1 r-cran-openssl/1.2.1+dfsg-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of openssl the autopk
11 matches
Mail list logo
