Hello,
On 03/07/2019 10:00, Marketa Calabkova wrote:
> On 02/07/2019 15:22, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> In any case ISTM that the real problem here is how u-a is being used in
>> SUSE, which is not how u-a expects it to be operated. I'd say you'd need
>> to switch to call it from %preun, which is
Hello,
On 02/07/2019 15:22, Guillem Jover wrote:
> ...
>> This is because update-alternatives first checks if it must modify
>> the auto-selection, and discovers that key files are missing so it
>> auto-corrects the alternative choice.
>> ...which is what I was telling it to do in the first
Hi!
On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 11:19:59 +0200, Marketa Calabkova wrote:
> I am afraid this bug got forgotten somehow... could you please look at
> it and give some answers?
Ah, sorry, this was filed against a non-existent package, and when
reassigned, it was not CCed.
On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 12:40:57
I am afraid this bug got forgotten somehow... could you please look at
it and give some answers?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: update-alternatives
Version: 1.18.23-1.19.0
In SUSE we use update-alternatives in our packages. When using
update-alternatives in %postun (e. g. what should happen after uninstalling the
package), the following warnings are emitted:
update-alternatives: warning: alternative
5 matches
Mail list logo
