Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-08-17 Thread Norbert Preining
> @Norbert: nevertheless I'd follow Karl's advice to build dvisvgm Fully agreed. The integration of dvisvgm into the TL sources is always a bit hacky. Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-08-17 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 16.08.19 20:11, Hector Oron wrote: Hi Hector, > JFYI, a give back (package rebuild from failed state) has been triggered > per IRC request: > > Day changed to 16 Aug 2019 > 12:08 < gnu_srs1> (11:51:02 PM) srs: Can somebody gb texlive-bin > 2019.20190605.51237-2 on >

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-08-16 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, JFYI, a give back (package rebuild from failed state) has been triggered per IRC request: Day changed to 16 Aug 2019 12:08 < gnu_srs1> (11:51:02 PM) srs: Can somebody gb texlive-bin 2019.20190605.51237-2 on hurd-i386. It built fine locally. signature.asc

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-08-08 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: block 926701 by 932968 Control: tags 926701 + pending Am 30.07.2019 um 08:20 teilte Norbert Preining mit: > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: >> rejected) you have to tag commit > > Thanks for the warning, but I have already tagged, but not pushed ;-) > Bug manipulation. H.

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-30 Thread Norbert Preining
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > rejected) you have to tag commit Thanks for the warning, but I have already tagged, but not pushed ;-) Norbert -- PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live +

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-29 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 26.07.2019 um 15:07 teilte Norbert Preining mit: Hi Norbert, > Uploaded. > > I wait with tagging until it is accepted. > I just noticed that the debian/watch file I created was broken. I've corrected it and pushed it to github. So (unless our package get's rejected) you have to tag commit

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-26 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 26.07.2019 um 07:24 teilte Norbert Preining mit: On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, dvisvgm build (and links) fine on Hurd. We have a failure in the test suite. I'll care about that later on. Ok, please check that I opened a bug @upstream [1] and got a patch for it. I'll

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-26 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > For the issue on Hurd I got a patch; I'll test it ASAP. The chroot on That could be the non-source upload in case of acceptance. Norbert -- PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-26 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 26.07.2019 um 15:07 teilte Norbert Preining mit: Hi, Uploaded. I wait with tagging until it is accepted. Great thanks! For the issue on Hurd I got a patch; I'll test it ASAP. The chroot on exodar was fixed, so I can use an official Debian porters box. Hope this is more fun, than my

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-26 Thread Norbert Preining
Uploaded. I wait with tagging until it is accepted. On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > > Am 26.07.2019 um 14:41 teilte Norbert Preining mit: > > > How do you interpret this? > > > See below. > > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > > > From now on, we will no longer allow

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-26 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 26.07.2019 um 14:41 teilte Norbert Preining mit: How do you interpret this? See below. On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: From now on, we will no longer allow binaries uploaded by maintainers to migrate to testing. This means that you will need to do source-only uploads if you

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-26 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Yes. It has to got through the new queue. Once this is done we can care Just to check, going to NEW do we need to do source only or source/binary uploads? Do you remember? Norbert -- PREINING Norbert

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-26 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 26.07.2019 um 14:28 teilte Norbert Preining mit: On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, Yes. It has to got through the new queue. Once this is done we can care Just to check, going to NEW do we need to do source only or source/binary uploads? Do you remember? No binary

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-26 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 26.07.2019 um 14:29 teilte Norbert Preining mit: Hi, Yes. It has to got through the new queue. Once this is done we can care about tl-binaries. Actually since you put in only a suggest, we could do that immediately. I am not sure whether we shouldn't do a Depends on dvisvgm instead... I

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-26 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi How do you interpret this? On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > From now on, we will no longer allow binaries uploaded by maintainers to > migrate to testing. This means that you will need to do source-only > uploads if you want them to reach bullseye. ... > Q: I needed to do a

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-26 Thread Norbert Preining
> Yes. It has to got through the new queue. Once this is done we can care > about tl-binaries. Actually since you put in only a suggest, we could do that immediately. I am not sure whether we shouldn't do a Depends on dvisvgm instead... Norbert -- PREINING Norbert

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-26 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 26.07.2019 um 13:48 teilte Norbert Preining mit: Hi, Done for dvisvgm. texlive-binaries has been adapted too, dvisvgm is not built any more, manual page is not installed. Ok, so should I upload dvisvgm? Yes. It has to got through the new queue. Once this is done we can care about

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-26 Thread Norbert Preining
Hallo Hilmar, > Done for dvisvgm. texlive-binaries has been adapted too, dvisvgm is not > built any more, manual page is not installed. Ok, so should I upload dvisvgm? > ??? What kind of support files? The manual page is not installed by > tl-bin any more. The dvisvgm package just contains

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-26 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 26.07.19 07:55, Norbert Preining wrote: Hi Norbert, > We still need to do the replace stuff ... I might be able to look into > it tomorrow, but today my time is running out. > > We need for sure replaces: texlive-binaries <= the current version in > sid. Then we disable it for the next

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-25 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Hilmar, On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > > Should we rewrite the history? Or leave it like it is? > > > Leave it. Ok. > I can't promise that I'll have a result soon. As Hurd is not a release > arch I don't see that as a show stopper. We could fix that in -1+x (with > x >= 1).

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 26.07.19 07:24, Norbert Preining wrote: Hi Norbert, > On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: >>> hille@debian-amd64-sid >>> >> Solved...hopefully. Sorry, missed that. > > Should we rewrite the history? Or leave it like it is? > Leave it. >> We're lintian clean. Do you have to chance

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-25 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Hilmar, On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > > hille@debian-amd64-sid > > > Solved...hopefully. Sorry, missed that. Should we rewrite the history? Or leave it like it is? > Statical "linking" the md5 calculation code solved the problem. Thanks > Have to re-learn that... ;-( Do

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 25.07.2019 um 23:53 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: Am 25.07.2019 um 20:53 teilte Norbert Preining mit: Hi, - I did not push the orig.tar.gz to pristine-tar branch yet, it is on    [1], please push the code. Ok, please do so at some point. Have to re-learn that... ;-( Do I have to create

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 25.07.2019 um 20:53 teilte Norbert Preining mit: Hi, a few things: - your email is not configured for git, git lists hille@debian-amd64-sid as email. Solved...hopefully. Sorry, missed that. E: dvisvgm: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl That is still open. Statical

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-25 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Hilmar, a few things: - your email is not configured for git, git lists hille@debian-amd64-sid as email. > W: dvisvgm source: useless-autoreconf-build-depends autotools-dev fixed > W: dvisvgm source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique gpl-3+ > (paragraph at line 11) > W:

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 25.07.2019 um 14:24 teilte Norbert Preining mit: Hi Norbert, No need to be lintian clean. It should be lintian clean when we tag a release, not before. Please don't hesitate to commit half-backed not ready stuff, that is normal!! Looking forward to your work. OK, I pushed everything to

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-25 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Hilmar, On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > I've created a repo on github now. The package should be at least > lintian clean before first commit. No need to be lintian clean. It should be lintian clean when we tag a release, not before. Please don't hesitate to commit half-backed not

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 25.07.19 11:00, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, >> I did some basic steps in packaging dvisvgm separately. Of course I'll > > Great, did you push your work to github so that I can take a look at it? > I will also take a look into the replace/depends

Bug#926701: [tlbuild] Bug#926701: dvisvgm binary fails to link on GNU Hurd

2019-07-25 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Hilmar, On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > I did some basic steps in packaging dvisvgm separately. Of course I'll Great, did you push your work to github so that I can take a look at it? I will also take a look into the replace/depends calls necessary for the upgrade. Thanks a lot