Bug#926784: firehol: Please document usage of iptables-legacy

2019-04-17 Thread Libor Klepáč
Hi, just a follow up from today. On host, where I was debuging firehol behaviour on iptables-nft vs. iptables- legacy (before reporting bug) , I got strange behavior after upgrading to 3.1.6+ds-8. It was caused by my manual change of iptables alternatives -legacy one. Sequence was like this: in

Bug#926784: firehol: Please document usage of iptables-legacy

2019-04-11 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello, thanks for your reports and the patch. On 10/04/2019 21:29, Libor Klepáč wrote: > Hi, > usage of -legacy variant can be patched in during build time. Indeed. But the question is rather why we should favour the legacy version over the default one. > > Included patch tested by manual runn

Bug#926784: firehol: Please document usage of iptables-legacy

2019-04-11 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello, thanks for your report. On 10/04/2019 13:10, Libor Klepáč wrote: > Package: firehol > Version: 3.1.6+ds-7 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > firehol seems to have problem to reread rules in nofast mode when using > iptables-nft. > See: https://github.com/firehol/firehol/issues/352 > > Here i

Bug#926784: firehol: Please document usage of iptables-legacy

2019-04-10 Thread Libor Klepáč
Hi, usage of -legacy variant can be patched in during build time. Included patch tested by manual running (i don't have disk space to install tex) of: ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make and checking generated ./sbin/install.config Libor Description: compatibility with iptables-legacy Author

Bug#926784: firehol: Please document usage of iptables-legacy

2019-04-10 Thread Libor Klepáč
Package: firehol Version: 3.1.6+ds-7 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, firehol seems to have problem to reread rules in nofast mode when using iptables-nft. See: https://github.com/firehol/firehol/issues/352 Here is part of output, it goes on to ERROR : # 30