Bug#926962: Acknowledgement (Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.)

2019-04-28 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Moin, On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 05:37:41PM +0200, Hanno 'Rince' Wagner wrote: > Helge Kreutzmann schrieb am Sonntag, den 28. April 2019: > > > attachement). Could the filename systemd.exec.5.2.po, i.e. the "exec" > > part be the problem? > > I guess yes, since we are indeed rejecting filenames with

Bug#926962: Acknowledgement (Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.)

2019-04-28 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hallo Cord, On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 09:58:24AM +, Cord Beermann wrote: > > I can send attachements of the same size just fine. I tried renaming > > the attachement it seems to work (I did not take the exact same > > attachement). Could the filename systemd.exec.5.2.po, i.e. the "exec" > > part

Bug#926962: Acknowledgement (Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.)

2019-04-28 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Helge Kreutzmann) hast geschrieben: > I can send attachements of the same size just fine. I tried renaming > the attachement it seems to work (I did not take the exact same > attachement). Could the filename systemd.exec.5.2.po, i.e. the "exec" > part be the problem? To enable us inves

Bug#926962: Acknowledgement (Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.)

2019-04-27 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello, I can send attachements of the same size just fine. I tried renaming the attachement it seems to work (I did not take the exact same attachement). Could the filename systemd.exec.5.2.po, i.e. the "exec" part be the problem? Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann