On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 09:22:53 -0500, Ron Lovell wrote:
> Building a modified package locally is something I certainly need to
> learn how to do, so I'll work on that. Then I know I can test fuse-
> exfat, the existing sshfs 2, and set up a Samba server.
For what it's worth, after patching
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:24:21 +0100 Simon McVittie
wrote:
> Does fuse3 provide everything that's needed to mount and unmount
older
> FUSE filesystems that are still linked to libfuse2, like gvfs-fuse?
>
> If it does, then gvfs-fuse can depend on fuse (>= 2.8.4) | fuse3, or
> just depend on plain
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 07:27:51 -0500, Ron Lovell wrote:
> Is the current dependency of gvfs-fuse on fuse (>=2.8.4) really
> necessary? Would a dep on simply 'fuse' suffice?
Does fuse3 provide everything that's needed to mount and unmount older
FUSE filesystems that are still linked to libfuse2,
Package: gvfs-fuse
Version: 1.38.1-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Basically this regards the transition from fuse to fuse3, my primary
motivation being to make the (Debian) world safe for a modern sshfs
(3.5+). As others have pointed out (g.e. Bug #918984), trying to replace
fuse with
4 matches
Mail list logo
