Bug#928921: reprotest: kernel too old SIGSEGV

2019-06-08 Thread Jonas Meurer
Control: subscribe -1 Hey, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > But while setting up CI for another package, I encountered another issue: > > install: fatal: unable to chown > /tmp/reprotest.1SX4Bu/build-experiment-1/debian/qmail/var/lib/qmail: invalid > argument > > Package builds fine, both on

Bug#928921: reprotest: kernel too old SIGSEGV

2019-06-05 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: retitle -1 reprotest: unable to chown [2019-05-12 22:12] Vagrant Cascadian > On 2019-05-13, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > Hello. I am working on setting up CI for my packages, and one of them > > fail "reprotest" phase with error: "FATAL: kernel too old"[1][2]. > > This is probably due to

Bug#928921: reprotest: kernel too old SIGSEGV

2019-05-12 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2019-05-13, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > Hello. I am working on setting up CI for my packages, and one of them > fail "reprotest" phase with error: "FATAL: kernel too old"[1][2]. This is probably due to the kernel variation using "setarch", which will cause uname to report a 2.6 kernel, which is

Bug#928921: reprotest: kernel too old SIGSEGV

2019-05-12 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Package: reprotest Version: 0.7.8 Severity: normal Hello. I am working on setting up CI for my packages, and one of them fail "reprotest" phase with error: "FATAL: kernel too old"[1][2]. I grepped upstream sources for "kernel too old" message and found nothing. Regular build is successful. Any