Control: found -1 1.0.8-1
Control: tag -1 = sid
Control: close -1
On Tue, 09 Jul 2019 13:56:40 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> The armel binaries have been removed from sid.
and buster, too.
Andreas
Followup-For: Bug #929450
Control: tag -1 - bullseye sid
The armel binaries have been removed from sid.
Andreas
I don't think I have access or permissions to rename/reassign the bug to
ftpmaster so they can remove the armel binaries.
How can I move this forward so that the package doesn't get autoremoved
next week?
Thanks,
Thomas
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 2:28 PM Thomas Calderon
wrote:
> OK, let's have
OK, let's have them removed, when I will push an updated version, I will
make sure to remove armel from the list of targets.
Do I need to do anything else for now?
Thanks,
Thomas
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 8:02 PM Peter Green
wrote:
> On 13/06/19 10:00, Thomas Calderon wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
On 13/06/19 10:00, Thomas Calderon wrote:
Hi there,
It's unfortunate that OCaml has removed the support for ocamlopt for armel, it
sounds like CamlCrush will not be able to ship for armel.
Is it required that I create an updated Debian release excluding armel as a
target or as you said,
Hi there,
It's unfortunate that OCaml has removed the support for ocamlopt for armel,
it sounds like CamlCrush will not be able to ship for armel.
Is it required that I create an updated Debian release excluding armel as a
target or as you said, ftpmaster can just remove the binaries?
I would
package: caml-crush
tags: buster,sid
severity: serious
x-debbugs-cc: debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org
caml-crush build-depends on ocaml-native-compilers. In stretch this was
a real package. In buster it is a virtual package provided by ocaml-base
on most architectures, but does not seem to
7 matches
Mail list logo
