Hi Dominique,
> Come to think of it, I've detailed the fix mechanism (sorry
> for the headache), but, in the end, the 'cme fix' command will
> cascade the fixes to end up with 'debhelper-compat (= 12)'
> (or whatever latest release). This is similar to the current
> mechanism where a cme fix for
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 15:46:45 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Jul 2019 16:08:16 +0200 Dominique Dumont wrote:
> > Here's what I plan to implement. I hope this
> > takes into account most common mistakes. This list below details the checks
> that will be
> > run on debhelper or
On Wed, 03 Jul 2019 16:08:16 +0200 Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Here's what I plan to implement. I hope this
> takes into account most common mistakes. This list below details the checks
that will be
> run on debhelper or debherlper-compat dependencies. (this doc looks better
with a monospace
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 19:54:51 +0200 gregor herrmann wrote:
> One might argue that forcing this change-of-style is a bit intrusive;
> but on the other hand it's supported by debhelper in buster and
> stretch-backports and is now the recommended way … So yes, I think a
> migration would be a good
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 19:01:09 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Friday, 7 June 2019 16:17:33 CEST gregor herrmann wrote:
> > "debhelper-compat (= N)" in debian/control is the replacement for
> > both
> > debhelper (>= N) # in debian/control
> > and
> > N # in debian/compat
>
> Doh, I
On Friday, 7 June 2019 16:17:33 CEST gregor herrmann wrote:
> "debhelper-compat (= N)" in debian/control is the replacement for
> both
> debhelper (>= N) # in debian/control
> and
> N # in debian/compat
Doh, I missed this one.
Looks like some migration instructions are in order.
On Fri, 07 Jun 2019 15:54:23 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Friday, 7 June 2019 15:34:42 CEST you wrote:
> > cme created an unneeded debian/compat file
> > (with "12");
> I thought compat file was always needed... When is it needed or not ?
"debhelper-compat (= N)" in debian/control is the
On Friday, 7 June 2019 15:34:42 CEST you wrote:
> cme created an unneeded debian/compat file
> (with "12");
I thought compat file was always needed... When is it needed or not ?
> interestingly without mentioning it in its output.
Weird. Which package are you working on ?
All the best
Package: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl
Version: 2.123
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I ran `cme fix dpkg' on a source package which has
Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 12),
in debian/control, and cme created an unneeded debian/compat file
(with "12");
9 matches
Mail list logo
