Hi Amy, Thank you for keep eyes on lxqt. I saw you have many activity on BTS and salsa. I cc'ed this email to LXQt packaging team. Hope everyone in the team can also sync with these updates.
I have some questions: It seems to me that the MRs you submitted were a workaround for lxqt-archiver replacement as lxqt-archiver is currently missing? Since lxqt-archiver has already uploaded into NEW. Will it breaks if users installed lxqt-archiver afterwards? If not, how can users make lxqt-archiver works as they expected? Should we wait a bit for lxqt-archiver to arrived since it designed by upstream and suppose to work and supported by upstream? Best regards, -Andrew Amy Kos <a...@disroot.org> 於 2021年1月13日 週三 上午1:18寫道: > Hi Andrew, > > thank you very much for uploading up to date lxqt packages. > > I've closed: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960040 > New lxqt-metapackages are probably optional, > also lxqt-archiver is not yet through ftp new byhand queue. > > I've tried to make a draft for lxqt-metapackages in salsa, > not sure if it is helpful at all, if not please close it. > > If possible, some time, please look at: > > https://salsa.debian.org/lxqt-team/libfm-qt/-/merge_requests/2 > Update archivers.list fix xarchiver command - a30ef507 > > and > > https://salsa.debian.org/lxde-team/libfm/-/merge_requests/2 > Update archivers.list fix xarchiver command - 103c4695 > > to finally fix: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930334 > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932461 > > Cheers, > Amy > -- -Andrew