Bug#931503: protobuf: FTBFS on x32 (now for a different reason)

2019-08-09 Thread Laurence Parry
Thanks for that. To be honest, what the test is doing seems odd to begin with - looks like it's converting a double to protobuf native format, then interpreting the result (which would be in python's '0x...' format?) as an integer (varint?) as it doesn't know what type it should be. But again, my

Bug#931503: protobuf: FTBFS on x32 (now for a different reason)

2019-08-09 Thread GCS
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:36 AM Laurence Parry wrote: > Unfortunately the build now fails earlier on x32 (indeed it seems on > most 32-bit platforms) during the Python 2.7 tests, so we can't see if > the fix worked yet: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=protobuf=experimental Seen

Bug#931503: protobuf: FTBFS on x32 (now for a different reason)

2019-08-08 Thread Laurence Parry
Unfortunately the build now fails earlier on x32 (indeed it seems on most 32-bit platforms) during the Python 2.7 tests, so we can't see if the fix worked yet: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=protobuf=experimental I believe this is