Thanks for that. To be honest, what the test is doing seems odd to begin
with - looks like it's converting a double to protobuf native format, then
interpreting the result (which would be in python's '0x...' format?) as an
integer (varint?) as it doesn't know what type it should be. But again, my
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:36 AM Laurence Parry wrote:
> Unfortunately the build now fails earlier on x32 (indeed it seems on
> most 32-bit platforms) during the Python 2.7 tests, so we can't see if
> the fix worked yet:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=protobuf=experimental
Seen
Unfortunately the build now fails earlier on x32 (indeed it seems on
most 32-bit platforms) during the Python 2.7 tests, so we can't see if
the fix worked yet:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=protobuf=experimental
I believe this is
3 matches
Mail list logo