Bug#932438: RFS: irqbalance/1.6.0-1 [ITA] -- Daemon to balance interrupts for SMP systems

2019-08-16 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-08-15 17:59] Paride Legovini > Dmitry Bogatov wrote on 06/08/2019: > > So, please: > > > > * drop --as-needed > > * fix spelling > > * finalize changelog (dch -r) > > Done. Uploaded. Tagged. Permissions granted. -- Note, that I send and fetch email in batch, once in a few days.

Bug#932438: RFS: irqbalance/1.6.0-1 [ITA] -- Daemon to balance interrupts for SMP systems

2019-08-15 Thread Paride Legovini
Dmitry Bogatov wrote on 06/08/2019: > So, please: > > * drop --as-needed > * fix spelling > * finalize changelog (dch -r) Done. Paride

Bug#932438: RFS: irqbalance/1.6.0-1 [ITA] -- Daemon to balance interrupts for SMP systems

2019-08-06 Thread Paride Legovini
Dmitry Bogatov wrote on 06/08/2019: > > [2019-08-05 22:33] Paride Legovini >> Dmitry Bogatov wrote on 23/07/2019: >>> [2019-07-21 11:36] Paride Legovini > 1. In [942ed5e] you added this line: > > export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed >> [...] >> That's my understanding

Bug#932438: RFS: irqbalance/1.6.0-1 [ITA] -- Daemon to balance interrupts for SMP systems

2019-08-06 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-08-05 22:33] Paride Legovini > Dmitry Bogatov wrote on 23/07/2019: > > [2019-07-21 11:36] Paride Legovini > >>> 1. In [942ed5e] you added this line: > >>> > >>> export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed > [...] > That's my understanding too. In this case I'm pretty sure the

Bug#932438: RFS: irqbalance/1.6.0-1 [ITA] -- Daemon to balance interrupts for SMP systems

2019-08-05 Thread Paride Legovini
Dmitry Bogatov wrote on 23/07/2019: > [2019-07-21 11:36] Paride Legovini >>> 1. In [942ed5e] you added this line: >>> >>> export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed >>> >>>Why is it needed? Maybe, these flags should be provided by >>>dpkg-buildflags(1)? >> >> dpkg-buildflags

Bug#932438: RFS: irqbalance/1.6.0-1 [ITA] -- Daemon to balance interrupts for SMP systems

2019-07-23 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: clone 932438 -2 control: reassign -2 irqbalance control: retitle -2 add support for oneshot invocation with runit control: owner -2 kact...@debian.org [2019-07-21 11:36] Paride Legovini > > 1. In [942ed5e] you added this line: > > > > export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND =

Bug#932438: RFS: irqbalance/1.6.0-1 [ITA] -- Daemon to balance interrupts for SMP systems

2019-07-21 Thread Paride Legovini
Paride Legovini wrote on 21/07/2019: > Dmitry Bogatov wrote on 20/07/2019: >>* current runscript does not respect ONESHOT option. It can be fixed >> with something like >> >>#!/bin/sh >>. /etc/default/irqbalance >>if [ -n "${ONESHOT:-}" ] ; then >>

Bug#932438: RFS: irqbalance/1.6.0-1 [ITA] -- Daemon to balance interrupts for SMP systems

2019-07-21 Thread Paride Legovini
Hi Dmitry, thanks for your review. Dmitry Bogatov wrote on 20/07/2019: > [2019-07-19 12:57] Paride Legovini >> Package: sponsorship-requests >> Severity: normal >> >> Please review my packaging branch for irqbalance/1.6.0-1 at: >> >> https://salsa.debian.org/paride-guest/irqbalance >> [...] >

Bug#932438: RFS: irqbalance/1.6.0-1 [ITA] -- Daemon to balance interrupts for SMP systems

2019-07-20 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-07-19 12:57] Paride Legovini > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Please review my packaging branch for irqbalance/1.6.0-1 at: > > https://salsa.debian.org/paride-guest/irqbalance > [...] On your changes: 1. In [942ed5e] you added this line: export

Bug#932438: RFS: irqbalance/1.6.0-1 [ITA] -- Daemon to balance interrupts for SMP systems

2019-07-19 Thread Paride Legovini
I fixed the spelling errors lintian complains about upstream: https://github.com/Irqbalance/irqbalance/commit/c30406b2b6f0e9c23b7 Paride

Bug#932438: RFS: irqbalance/1.6.0-1 [ITA] -- Daemon to balance interrupts for SMP systems

2019-07-19 Thread Paride Legovini
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Please review my packaging branch for irqbalance/1.6.0-1 at: https://salsa.debian.org/paride-guest/irqbalance In the beginning I thought this was going to be an easy one, it turned out not to be the case. This means that even the review won't be