On 8/13/19 12:31 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
The severity does indeed not need to imply that or a no-dsa
necessarily. In this concrete case we have already marked the issue as
no-dsa though:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-13509
Thanks for the link! I thought the no-d
Hi Arnaud,
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:28:08AM +0200, Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
> This is fixed in unstable.
>
> Question from a non-experienced DM: severity is "normal", should I
> understand that this fix shouldn't be included in stable? Or should I
> expect an explicit "no-dsa" tag?
The severity
This is fixed in unstable.
Question from a non-experienced DM: severity is "normal", should I
understand that this fix shouldn't be included in stable? Or should I
expect an explicit "no-dsa" tag?
Thanks,
Arnaud
Source: docker.io
Version: 18.09.1+dfsg1-7.1
Severity: normal
Tags: security upstream
Control: found -1 18.09.5+dfsg1-1
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for docker.io. If I do
understand the isuse correctly, then I do not think there is any
urgend action to be taken for buster, it mi
4 matches
Mail list logo