Bug#934308: buster-pu: package dpdk/18.11.2-2+deb10u1

2019-09-02 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 18:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 14:19 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > Would it make your life easier if I uploaded a new revision to > > unstable? There's a few small cosmetic cleanups I can do, like > > bumping standards-version and such. > > If y

Bug#934308: buster-pu: package dpdk/18.11.2-2+deb10u1

2019-09-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 14:19 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Would it make your life easier if I uploaded a new revision to > unstable? There's a few small cosmetic cleanups I can do, like > bumping standards-version and such. If you've got enough changes to usefully justify a -3 that we could age to

Bug#934308: buster-pu: package dpdk/18.11.2-2+deb10u1

2019-09-02 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 14:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2019-09-02 14:09, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > I'm slightly confused though: unstable has 18.11.2-2, and p-u has a > > +deb10u1 changelog-only rebuild of that - is this not the right > > procedure? What is missing from unstable/testing? >

Bug#934308: buster-pu: package dpdk/18.11.2-2+deb10u1

2019-09-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2019-09-02 14:09, Luca Boccassi wrote: I'm slightly confused though: unstable has 18.11.2-2, and p-u has a +deb10u1 changelog-only rebuild of that - is this not the right procedure? What is missing from unstable/testing? Ah, I see. In which case, the lack of fixes isn't an issue, but the ve

Bug#934308: buster-pu: package dpdk/18.11.2-2+deb10u1

2019-09-02 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 14:03 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2019-08-21 12:48, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 23:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > > > This request never made it to debian-release, most likely due to > > > the > > > size o

Bug#934308: buster-pu: package dpdk/18.11.2-2+deb10u1

2019-09-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2019-08-21 12:48, Luca Boccassi wrote: On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 23:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + confirmed This request never made it to debian-release, most likely due to the size of the diff. Sorry, didn't notice that! On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 13:54 +0100, Luca Boccassi

Bug#934308: buster-pu: package dpdk/18.11.2-2+deb10u1

2019-08-21 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 23:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > This request never made it to debian-release, most likely due to the > size of the diff. Sorry, didn't notice that! > On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 13:54 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > We would like to upload a

Bug#934308: buster-pu: package dpdk/18.11.2-2+deb10u1

2019-08-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed This request never made it to debian-release, most likely due to the size of the diff. On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 13:54 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > We would like to upload a new LTS release version of DPDK to buster. > We have already done this previously in stretch, and