Bug#934926: [Pkg-zsh-devel] Bug#934926: update (overridding of default fpath causes uncessary complexity and pain for software providing zsh completions)

2022-01-09 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Axel Beckert wrote on Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 08:52:04 +0100: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > […], or /etc/zsh/zshrc.d/ could be added (there's a separate ticket > > for that but my quick grep didn't find it), > > You probably had https://bugs.debian.org/776663 in mind which has been > filed against

Bug#934926: [Pkg-zsh-devel] Bug#934926: update (overridding of default fpath causes uncessary complexity and pain for software providing zsh completions)

2022-01-09 Thread Frank Terbeck
Axel Beckert wrote: […] >> With that, we could add the prefix based site-functions directory, >> but deprecate its use. > > Ack, that thought came to me also after having read your mail > half-through. It though has the danger that some so far not active > plugins will suddenly start to work. So

Bug#934926: [Pkg-zsh-devel] Bug#934926: update (overridding of default fpath causes uncessary complexity and pain for software providing zsh completions)

2022-01-09 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Frank, thanks a lot for trying to wrap the history of all these directories! I wasn't aware of this non-obvious timeline with Debian having added vendor-* directories before upstream last updated their search paths. > The reason this doesn't get added on Debian right now is that we're >

Bug#934926: [Pkg-zsh-devel] Bug#934926: update (overridding of default fpath causes uncessary complexity and pain for software providing zsh completions)

2022-01-08 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Daniel, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > That's not to say that things can't be improved going forward. The big question to me seems "how?". > […], or /etc/zsh/zshrc.d/ could be added (there's a separate ticket > for that but my quick grep didn't find it), You probably had