> I think this namespace is something that belongs to the maintainer(s)
> of the package in Debian and you should not have simply created it
> without asking. I think it can be made into what I would have
> preferred, but I expect that if you do this kind of thing a lot you
> may get annoyed
Gianfranco Costamagna writes ("Re: adns package is undermaintained and needs
comaintainers"):
> yes it is, I did forget a -e 10, and it went directly in unstable
> (sorry for this, it wasn't something I wanted to do, I wanted to see the
> previous version migrate before my one...)
Oh I see.
Hello,
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:14:27 +0100 Ian Jackson
wrote:
> Package: adns
> Version: 1.5.0~rc1-1.2
>
> Hi, Gianfranco and Magnus. Thanks to both of you for taking care of
> my package. (CCing one of the bugs Gianfranco fixed, to have some
> kind of public record of this conversation.)
>
Package: adns
Version: 1.5.0~rc1-1.2
Hi, Gianfranco and Magnus. Thanks to both of you for taking care of
my package. (CCing one of the bugs Gianfranco fixed, to have some
kind of public record of this conversation.)
Debian FTP Masters writes ("Processing of adns_1.5.1-0.1_source.changes"):
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
