On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 11:12:51AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:37:36AM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > do you have any plan on completing this port? I'm not a user of
> > archivemail but it looks like it should be removed, not salvaged:
> >
> > * no new upstream
Hi!
I used this frequently enough to be hesitant to let apt dist-upgrade
remove it on my system currently.
But I understand it may not make sense to port it as its hard and
upstream is not active anymore.
Is there an alternative in Debian repository?
Best,
--
Martin
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:37:36AM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
do you have any plan on completing this port? I'm not a user of
archivemail but it looks like it should be removed, not salvaged:
* no new upstream releases since 2011 (!)
* last upload to debian in 2014
* retired from fedora:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2020 13:56:59 -0400 (EDT) Scott Talbert wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2020, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
archivemail seems to be a good candidate to RM due to dead upstream.
However, it still has a relatively high popcon, so people seem to be using
Hey Scott and Jonathan,
On Thu, 28 May 2020 13:56:59 -0400 (EDT) Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2020, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
> >> archivemail seems to be a good candidate to RM due to dead upstream.
> >> However, it still has a relatively high popcon, so people seem to be using
> >>
On Tue, 26 May 2020, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
archivemail seems to be a good candidate to RM due to dead upstream.
However, it still has a relatively high popcon, so people seem to be using
it.
I'm willing to take a stab at porting to Python 3 if anyone is available to
test it? The port
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 03:31:31PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
archivemail seems to be a good candidate to RM due to dead upstream.
However, it still has a relatively high popcon, so people seem to be
using it.
I'm willing to take a stab at porting to Python 3 if anyone is
available to test
archivemail seems to be a good candidate to RM due to dead upstream.
However, it still has a relatively high popcon, so people seem to be using
it.
I'm willing to take a stab at porting to Python 3 if anyone is available
to test it? The port effort doesn't look that bad at first glance, but
8 matches
Mail list logo
