Bug#936681: gwyddion: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-20 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:57:00PM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > OK, I'll start working on this then and I'll ping you when I'm done (I > have commit access to debian-med but I'm not a DD). I'll probably > remove or at least disable Shayan's patch as it is not sufficient and > this code won't

Bug#936681: gwyddion: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-20 Thread Yavor Doganov
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:49:44AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I guess you have read the past conversation that upstream is not > willing to port code to GTK 3. Yes, that's why I don't think it's a good idea for me to attempt porting it -- the result won't be merged in. > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019

Bug#936681: gwyddion: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I guess you have read the past conversation that upstream is not willing to port code to GTK 3. On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:20:38PM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > IMO the only chance to keep gwyddion in bullseye is to build it with > the option --disable-pygwy. This will automatically

Bug#936681: gwyddion: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-20 Thread Yavor Doganov
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 08:27:59PM +0100, Shayan Doust wrote: > Just a notice to those who read this: it seems like with the python2 -> > python3 migration, python-gtk2-dev becomes redundant and should be avoided. It's more complex than that. PyGTK is strictly tied to Python 2 and GTK 2. To

Bug#936681: gwyddion: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-09-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Shayan, On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 05:43:16PM +0100, he...@shayandoust.me wrote: > Hello Andreas, > > Many thanks for your reply, and after reading the referred mail, saving me > from a potential headache :). Now that I think of it, it may just be good > practice to look at other open bugs

Bug#936681: gwyddion: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-09-30 Thread hello
Hello Andreas, Many thanks for your reply, and after reading the referred mail, saving me from a potential headache :). Now that I think of it, it may just be good practice to look at other open bugs when working on packages. The task will probably end up being big and future upstream releases

Bug#936681: gwyddion: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-09-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Shayan, thanks for caring for this. Please make sure you will not fall in the same trap to trigger an unfriendly response like I've got here: https://bugs.debian.org/911167 ... or at least be prepared to receive an unfriendly response for an IMHO perfectly valid request. Thanks for your

Bug#936681: gwyddion: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-09-29 Thread Shayan Doust
Hello, Just a notice to those who read this: it seems like with the python2 -> python3 migration, python-gtk2-dev becomes redundant and should be avoided. I will try contact upstream to see if this is a possible change to incorporate into their workflow as any future releases will probably be