Bug#938757: unrardll: diff for NMU version 0.1.3-3.1

Hi Sandro, > calibre only declares a Suggests on unrardll; as per policy Because it is in contrib, and not main ... > that means calibre should work perfectly fine even without unrardll. It does, but a considerable part of the functionality is missing. > should consider bump it to at least

Bug#938757: unrardll: diff for NMU version 0.1.3-3.1

> You might not have seen my blog posts about the state of calibre in Debian, > they have been aggregated on planet. i read it, and i considered when preparing this NMU. > Anyway, as long as I keep a Py2 version of Calibre in sid/testing, **do not** > remove Py2 support from unrardll. calibre

Bug#938757: unrardll: diff for NMU version 0.1.3-3.1

And in addition, you might want to read up on https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu Thanks Norbert -- PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev GPG: 0x860CDC13

Bug#938757: unrardll: diff for NMU version 0.1.3-3.1

Control: tags 938757 - pending Dear Sandro, Thanks for your interest, but please stop this, please, immediately. You might not have seen my blog posts about the state of calibre in Debian, they have been aggregated on planet. Anyway, as long as I keep a Py2 version of Calibre in sid/testing,

Bug#938757: unrardll: diff for NMU version 0.1.3-3.1

Control: tags 938757 + patch Control: tags 938757 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for unrardll (versioned as 0.1.3-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru unrardll-0.1.3/debian/changelog