Hi Noah,
On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 07:10:24 -0700 Noah Meyerhans
wrote:
> I think unifying the functionality of this package with
> init-system-helpers would be preferable. But beyond just polluting the
> package namespace, I'm a bit annoyed by the stuff that this package
> leaves around the
[2019-09-04 07:10] Noah Meyerhans
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 09:38:36PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > > Just for my curiosity (not going to happen in my watch), would you be
> > > happier if `runit-helper` script was part of init-system-helpers (which
> > > is essential, anyway).
> >
> > I'm
[2019-09-01 21:38] Shengjing Zhu
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:23 PM Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > Just for my curiosity (not going to happen in my watch), would you be
> > happier if `runit-helper` script was part of init-system-helpers (which
> > is essential, anyway).
> I'm not sure why you didn't
On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 09:38:36PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > Just for my curiosity (not going to happen in my watch), would you be
> > happier if `runit-helper` script was part of init-system-helpers (which
> > is essential, anyway).
>
> I'm not sure why you didn't chose this at first. As
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:23 PM Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> Just for my curiosity (not going to happen in my watch), would you be
> happier if `runit-helper` script was part of init-system-helpers (which
> is essential, anyway).
I'm not sure why you didn't chose this at first. As it calls itself
[2019-08-30 23:38] Shengjing Zhu
> Package: runit-helper
> Version: 2.8.13.2
> Severity: normal
>
> Please, don't do that. Don't let it be a second libsystemd0.
Well, I am not happy with this situation myself too, but I do not know
do it better.
`runit-helper` is essentially
Package: runit-helper
Version: 2.8.13.2
Severity: normal
Please, don't do that. Don't let it be a second libsystemd0.
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
7 matches
Mail list logo
