On 9/5/19 4:33 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Le jeudi 05 septembre 2019 à 15:44 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
>> On 9/5/19 3:38 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>>> I have recently tried to bootstrap both ppc64el and riscv64, but it
>>> failed in both cases. The support for those archit
Le jeudi 05 septembre 2019 à 15:44 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 9/5/19 3:38 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > I have recently tried to bootstrap both ppc64el and riscv64, but it
> > failed in both cases. The support for those architectures is still
> > experimental, and obviously
On 9/5/19 3:38 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> I have recently tried to bootstrap both ppc64el and riscv64, but it
> failed in both cases. The support for those architectures is still
> experimental, and obviously not yet ready for inclusion in Debian.
>
> I did not try the other (non-release) arc
Le jeudi 05 septembre 2019 à 09:00 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> Source: sbcl
> Version: 2:1.5.6-1
> Severity: normal
> Looking at the buildd results [1] and comparing with the actual sbcl source
> [2],
> it seems that sbcl supports more architectures than are currently enabled,
>
Source: sbcl
Version: 2:1.5.6-1
Severity: normal
Hi!
Looking at the buildd results [1] and comparing with the actual sbcl source [2],
it seems that sbcl supports more architectures than are currently enabled,
including alpha, hppa, ppc64 and riscv. sparc is probably not usable because
Debian has
5 matches
Mail list logo
