On 2019-10-12 03:52, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
> Control: tag -1 + confirmed
>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 04:58:23PM -0700, Josue Ortega wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've included the recommended changes for the fix:
>>
>> rpcbind (1.2.5-0.3+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
>>
>>
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 04:58:23PM -0700, Josue Ortega wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've included the recommended changes for the fix:
>
> rpcbind (1.2.5-0.3+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
>
> * Add 00-rmt-calls.patch (Closes: #939877):
> + Add
Hi,
I've included the recommended changes for the fix:
rpcbind (1.2.5-0.3+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
* Add 00-rmt-calls.patch (Closes: #939877):
+ Add command line option to enable remote calls at runtime
+ Refresh debian/patches
* debian/control: Update maintainer information
On 2019-09-09 20:06, Sam Hartman wrote:
> It seems concerning to decrease the security of rpcbind to the NIS
> level with no option for the user to request the higher level of
> security.
You have a very good point here. Helped me to fully understand the
situation
> I do agree that fixing nis
> "Sam" == Sam Hartman writes:
> "Josue" == Josue Ortega writes:
Josue> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 08:27:31PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>> What are the security implications of enabling this configure
>>> flag?
Josue> Enabling this flag lets rpcbind to open random
> "Josue" == Josue Ortega writes:
Josue> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 08:27:31PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> What are the security implications of enabling this configure
>> flag?
Josue> Enabling this flag lets rpcbind to open random listening
Josue> ports. This would make
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 08:27:31PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> What are the security implications of enabling this configure flag?
Enabling this flag lets rpcbind to open random listening ports.
This would make firewalling very hard.
(Default behavior prior version 1.2.5)
> Why is it off by
What are the security implications of enabling this configure flag?
Why is it off by default?
On 2019-09-09 13:45, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 13:28 -0600, Josue Ortega wrote:
>> I'd like to update rpcbind in Buster to fix the response to broadcast
>> requests.
>> Currently the broadcast requests are broken in Buster causing
>> problems
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 13:28 -0600, Josue Ortega wrote:
> I'd like to update rpcbind in Buster to fix the response to broadcast
> requests.
> Currently the broadcast requests are broken in Buster causing
> problems to users
> using NIS services. See #939877 and
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I'd like to update rpcbind in Buster to fix the response to broadcast requests.
Currently the broadcast requests are broken in Buster causing problems to users
using NIS
11 matches
Mail list logo