El 10/7/23 a las 17:57, Ben Wong escribió:
Thanks for the tip! I will look into ansible. I had thought it was for large
organizations, but if it is what Debian recommends for upgrades, then I am
happy to learn it.
Ok, just to clarify: ansible was only one of many options available, and also
I
Oh! I'm sorry. I had expected Debian's official "PRETTY NAME" in
/etc/os-release to be the preferred name for showing to users.
To show it without the code name, but to have it automatically update
whenever /etc/os-release is changed, this works:
\S{NAME} \S{VERSION_ID} \n \l
Thanks,
—Ben
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:22:00AM -0800, Ben Wong wrote:
> Hi, I know this is low-priority and everyone is busy on important matters,
> but I was wondering if anybody had looked at this yet. The fix I included
> is simple and easily verified. I'm hoping that it can be included in Debian
> 11 (Bull
Hi, I know this is low-priority and everyone is busy on important matters,
but I was wondering if anybody had looked at this yet. The fix I included
is simple and easily verified. I'm hoping that it can be included in Debian
11 (Bullseye).
Thanks,
—Ben
Package: base-files
Version: 10.3+deb10u1
Severity: normal
File: /etc/issue
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
When upgrading to Debian Buster, I noticed that Debian had updated
/etc/issue to include the version number ("Debian GNU/Linux 10").
There is no reason for this since that data is already incl
5 matches
Mail list logo