I see 0.8.1 in buster-bpo now. Thank you!
Oh, and to be clear, the process is rarely any more complex than "apt-get
source firewalld/testing" and "dpkg-buildpackage". firewalld's dependencies
are small and slow-changing, at the moment stable-bpo contains all
necessary versions for firewalld/testing.
Colm
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 8:05 PM
I configure it using the command line; I have found some of the new
features and bugfixes in 0.7 to be useful for my setup, so I've been
building a samizdat 0.7.2 package myself, which "seems to work". However, I
only install firewalld_xxx.deb, not firewall-applet_xxx nor
firewall-config_xxx
Colm
Am 20.11.19 um 20:57 schrieb Colm Buckley:
> Hum. I can validate the operations of firewalld itself, but I don't use
> either the applet or the config package.
How exactly do you intend to use the bpo package then?
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
Hum. I can validate the operations of firewalld itself, but I don't use
either the applet or the config package.
Colm
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 6:55 PM Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 20.11.19 um 19:45 schrieb Colm Buckley:
> > I feel that the answer is both yes and no. The *packaging* is trivial in
Am 20.11.19 um 19:45 schrieb Colm Buckley:
> I feel that the answer is both yes and no. The *packaging* is trivial in
> my experience - the dependencies of firewalld are fairly
> small/manageable, and 0.7.2 *seems* to work fine with everything in
> stable-bpo. However, I have no experience with
I feel that the answer is both yes and no. The *packaging* is trivial in my
experience - the dependencies of firewalld are fairly small/manageable, and
0.7.2 *seems* to work fine with everything in stable-bpo. However, I have
no experience with running Debian test suites and ensuring that all the
Am 20.11.19 um 19:24 schrieb Colm Buckley:
> @biebl - looks as though stable-bpo's nftables package tracks upstream
> pretty closely; if https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues/540 is
> resolved, would you consider looking at packaging 0.8.0 for backports?
I'm not really sure if I can
@biebl - looks as though stable-bpo's nftables package tracks upstream
pretty closely; if https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues/540 is
resolved, would you consider looking at packaging 0.8.0 for backports?
Package: firewalld
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
firewalld 0.7 introduces sufficient new capabilities that it would be great to
see
it more widely available in the stable distribution. I would like to suggest
that it be added to buster-backports.
It does not appear to
10 matches
Mail list logo
