user pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
usertag 941758 + buster-backport
done
Am 07.10.19 um 12:52 schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
> Fair enough, thanks. Realistically I doubt I'll work on one and I'll
> wait instead for buster-backports. But I'll probably have a look to see
> if I can fin
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:49:01PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
A buster-backport, sure, that is defintely going to happen.
The current version of systemd in bullseye is imho in a pretty good
shape, so I might just do a backport of 242-7.
Great.
Alternatively, assuming a reasonable patch can b
Am 07.10.19 um 10:29 schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 02:20:48AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Do you know about automount units?
>> They would be the perfect fit for your use case.
>
> From what I understand they behave like pre-systemd automounting, that
> is, any process tha
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 02:20:48AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Do you know about automount units?
They would be the perfect fit for your use case.
From what I understand they behave like pre-systemd automounting, that
is, any process that attempted to read/open /backup would cause it to be
moun
Am 04.10.19 um 22:57 schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 241-7~deb10u1
> Severity: normal
>
> I have a mount unit as follows
>
> [Unit]
> Requires=systemd-cryptsetup@backup.service
> StopWhenUnneeded=true
>
> [Mount]
> What=/dev/phobos_backup/backup
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
