block 943865 with 1006202
thanks
SWR was removed from mesa, but it is still available in mesa-amber
Package: src:mesa
Followup-For: Bug #943865
Hi Timo.
I would keep llvmpipe even on x86. Two reasons.
1. Ability to run on SSE2 only hardware
2. SWR do have some bugs compared to llvmpipe which is working almost perfectly.
Having both is also good for testing and benchmarking both as it
On 11.11.2019 11.54, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> I'm thinking this should replace llvmpipe on x86 if enabled, there's no
> point in keeping both especially since llvmpipe would still be the default.
On a second thought, I can't see a way to do this, as both require llvm
and 'swrast' driver enabled.
On 31.10.2019 1.35, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> Package: src:mesa
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> SWR is a new high performance rasterizer that is usually significantly
> faster than softpipe or llvmpipe and is merged in upstream Mesa for
> some time.
>
> Adding these meson extra flags:
Package: src:mesa
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
SWR is a new high performance rasterizer that is usually significantly
faster than softpipe or llvmpipe and is merged in upstream Mesa for
some time.
Adding these meson extra flags:
"-Dgallium-drivers=,swrast,swr"
5 matches
Mail list logo
