Bug#944040: haveged requires debhelper >= 12.5

2020-02-03 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi Nicolas, On 2/3/20 7:28 PM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > I had missed the dh_makeshlibs call when looking for something that would > require a newer dh. >_>' good catch! i didn't spotted that when looking at it.. > I'm commiting a fix to the packaging repo r.n., so the next upload should

Bug#944040: haveged requires debhelper >= 12.5

2020-02-03 Thread Nicolas Braud-Santoni
PS: According to the manpage the actual version constraint should be 12.3 On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 07:28:29PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > Control: tag -1 - moreinfo + confirmed pending > > Hi Daniel, > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 08:28:02AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > On 1/31/20

Bug#944040: haveged requires debhelper >= 12.5

2020-02-03 Thread Nicolas Braud-Santoni
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo + confirmed pending Hi Daniel, On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 08:28:02AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 1/31/20 5:54 AM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > > I'm not able to reproduce your issue; I literally just made a backport > > without changing the original package

Bug#944040: haveged requires debhelper >= 12.5

2020-01-30 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi Nicolas, On 1/31/20 5:54 AM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > I'm not able to reproduce your issue; I literally just made a backport > without changing the original package (except for the d/changelog entry), > which built fine in my buster-backports environment. I can reproduce it with

Bug#944040: haveged requires debhelper >= 12.5

2020-01-30 Thread Nicolas Braud-Santoni
Control: retitle -1 haveged requires debhelper >= 12.5 Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hi Daniel, On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 09:43:07AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > haveged 1.9.8-1 FTBFS on stable because it requires debhelper >= 12.5 > without declaring so. I'm not able to reproduce your issue; I