On 10/03/2021 14.14, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
Thanks for filing 984929.
Do you have a sense for what the cutoff should be for trying to get 984929
resolved vs. just uploading a workaround in the dkms-consuming packages
(e.g., openafs)?
I do not have a good workarounnd for the affected packages.
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for filing 984929.
Do you have a sense for what the cutoff should be for trying to get 984929
resolved vs. just uploading a workaround in the dkms-consuming packages
(e.g., openafs)?
Thanks,
Ben
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 01:09:06PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
2 matches
Mail list logo