Hi Vincent,
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 3:52 PM McIntyre, Vincent (CASS, Marsfield)
wrote:
>
> I really don't know what's better. I lean toward adding it.
Lowercase 'd' added here:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/d6fe1e5426a7897a3c4af42fa216a740532978e6
Kind regards
Felix
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 03:13:09PM -0800, Felix Lechner wrote:
>Hi Vincent,
>
>On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 2:32 PM McIntyre, Vincent (CASS, Marsfield)
> wrote:
>>
>> +} elsif ($basename =~
>> m/^(?:.*\.)?(?:changelog|NEWS|TODO).[dD]ebian$/o) {
>
>My check does not currently implement the
Hi Vincent,
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 2:32 PM McIntyre, Vincent (CASS, Marsfield)
wrote:
>
> I can't see anything in policy that requires these naming minutiae.
We would like to shed the image of enforcer. Only a few Lintian tags
relate to policy. Lintian provides packaging advice for the benefit
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 09:50:32AM -0800, Felix Lechner wrote:
>Implemented for NEWS, which was your primary concern:
>
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/ae38f4d7301ba8a6064025b86984d49843d61355
>
Looks awesome. I was working on a hack but this is much better.
One question
Hi Vincent,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:33 PM Vincent McIntyre wrote:
>
> The reason for this appears to be longstanding, see bug 429510.
That bug indicates that the behavior is inconsistent between README/NEWS/TODO.
> Perhaps lintian could warn about this?
Implemented for NEWS, which was your
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 08:38:55PM -0800, Felix Lechner wrote:
>Hi Vincent,
>
>
>> There may already be a similar check for debian/[README|TODO].Debian
>
>Which tag are you referring to, please?
>
I'm sorry, I don't know of one. I was just speculating that lintian
may have a check like this.
Hi Vincent,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:33 PM Vincent McIntyre wrote:
>
> The reason for this appears to be longstanding, see bug 429510.
>
> This issue may go away with a later debhelper compatibility level
> but since it's been around since 2007, perhaps it's worth a lintian rule.
>
> Perhaps
Package: lintian
Version: 2.39.0
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
unison (2.48.4-3) was released without an important note in the NEWS file.
The note was in the package source, but not included in the binary package.
See bug 946041.
The reason for this appears to be longstanding, see bug
8 matches
Mail list logo
