Bug#946451: spyder: work on new upstream release

2021-01-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 09:47:51AM +, Jitse Niesen wrote: > On 04/01/2021 22:10, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > > Then there are only 6 other failures; again, I haven't investigated > > further. I don't know what "xfailures" are. > > This stands for expected failures; they are tests that fail on

Bug#946451: spyder: work on new upstream release

2021-01-05 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2021-01-04 12:00, Pablo Mestre wrote: Hi Drew, Thanks! I'll do the three ITP pending packages and start filing the ITPs within the next two days, all being well. And I have very good news! I discovered that upgrading python3-qtawesome allows Spyder to run! There are almost certainly

Bug#946451: spyder: work on new upstream release

2021-01-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 10:00:25PM -0300, Pablo Mestre wrote: > > Hi Drew, > > > > Thanks! > > > > I'll do the three ITP pending packages and start filing the ITPs > > within the next two days, all being well. > > > > And I have very good news! I discovered that upgrading > > python3-qtawesome

Bug#946451: spyder: work on new upstream release

2021-01-03 Thread Pablo Mestre
> Hi Drew, > > Thanks! > > I'll do the three ITP pending packages and start filing the ITPs > within the next two days, all being well. > > And I have very good news! I discovered that upgrading > python3-qtawesome allows Spyder to run! There are almost certainly > bugs, as jedi and parso have

Bug#946451: spyder: work on new upstream release

2021-01-03 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 08:58:26AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote: > On 2021-01-04 00:38, Julian Gilbey wrote: > ... > > I still can't run Spyder and I don't know why not. But I have > > built all of the dependencies and they are all on salsa; I haven't yet > > submitted ITPs for them but they are all

Bug#946451: spyder: work on new upstream release

2021-01-03 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2021-01-04 00:38, Julian Gilbey wrote: ... I still can't run Spyder and I don't know why not. But I have built all of the dependencies and they are all on salsa; I haven't yet submitted ITPs for them but they are all ready to go. (I also haven't checked whether anyone else has already done

Bug#946451: spyder: work on new upstream release

2021-01-03 Thread Jitse Niesen
Dear Julian and others, Thank you all for your efforts on packaging Spyder for Debian. As an upstream developer and a Debian user, I have an interest in it and hopefully I'll be able to help a bit. On 03/01/2021 13:38, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Most of the errors were to do with font prefixes,

Bug#946451: Bug#963605: Bug#946451: spyder: work on new upstream release

2021-01-03 Thread Pablo Mestre
El 3/1/21 a las 10:38, Julian Gilbey escribió: > Dear Drew and everyone, > > [] > > tl;dr - I still can't run Spyder and I don't know why not. But I have > built all of the dependencies and they are all on salsa; I haven't yet > submitted ITPs for them but they are all ready to go. (I also

Bug#946451: spyder: work on new upstream release

2021-01-03 Thread Julian Gilbey
Dear Drew and everyone, (This message is Bcc'd to the two ITPs for python-language-server (#963605) and python-jsonrpc-server (#964497), but it makes sense for the discussion to remain on one report only. I've also cc'd Otto - see below.) I was frustrated that I couldn't use Spyder 3 any more