On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 02:46:32PM +0100, Gürkan Myczko wrote:
> 14:40 < tarzeau> coreboot sources are partly GPL-2-only (aka GPL-2) some are
> GPL-2-or-later (aka GPL-2+), is it possible to clean that up?
> 14:40 < tarzeau> relicense to one?
> 14:40 < maxii> but cb_parse_framebuffer() doesn't
> > If there really is a problem with those files I would appreciate your
> > letting me know what I missed. Otherwise I hope you can avoid the
> > repacking trouble in the future.
> Probably not, but the repacking is not trouble.
Without a good reason, you really shouldn't repack [1]. I do not
14:40 < tarzeau> coreboot sources are partly GPL-2-only (aka GPL-2) some
are GPL-2-or-later (aka GPL-2+), is it possible to clean that up?
14:40 < tarzeau> relicense to one?
14:40 < maxii> but cb_parse_framebuffer() doesn't seem to get called
14:40 < tarzeau> debian/ubuntu packaging effort
Heya,
Please contact upstream about that GPL-2 vs GPL-2+ issue. They may not
be aware.
Cheers,
Steffen
On 27.01.20 13:19, Gürkan Myczko wrote:
Hi John,
The package is in great shape. The only challenge to getting the
package in
the archive seems to be the copyright file. Coreboot's README
Hi John,
The package is in great shape. The only challenge to getting the
package in
the archive seems to be the copyright file. Coreboot's README says
Some files are licensed under the "GPL (version 2, or any later
version)",
and some files are licensed under the "GPL, version 2". For some
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "coreboot"
https://bugs.debian.org/381727
* Package name: coreboot
Version : 4.10-1
Upstream Author : http://linuxbios.org/index.php/Contributors
* URL :
6 matches
Mail list logo