Hello!
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:52:32AM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Hello all,
[...]
> Strong password hashing is one thing, but src:pam now FTBFS [] should
> be fixed in 1.4.0
>
> So IMVHO, we need to update to at least 1.4.0 at least before the release.
Thanks for your input. I
Hello all,
First let me apologies to Andreas for the lack of answer to his previous
mail. 2020 drained all my energy and motivation.
So thanks for your work Andreas!
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:15:42 +0100 Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 05, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> > Now that Debian has libxcrypt
On Jan 05, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Now that Debian has libxcrypt in place of the old crypt(3)
> implementation from glibc, we need a newer version of the PAM package to
> actually use the modern password hashing methods.
Can we get some feedback on this issue? The bug has been marked as
pending
Source: pam
Severity: wishlist
Now that Debian has libxcrypt in place of the old crypt(3)
implementation from glibc, we need a newer version of the PAM package to
actually use the modern password hashing methods.
Fedora has backported from the PAM upstream repository a few patches
like this
4 matches
Mail list logo
