On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 04:32:14PM -0500, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> In this case a rebuild might be worthwhile anyway. Rebuilding package is
> almost always harmless.
Well, rebuilding movit would fix it, but it would also break any reverse
dependency, so they would also need to be rebuilt. And if my
Hi,
在 2020-01-19日的 10:38 +0100，Steinar H. Gunderson写道：
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 12:50:43AM -0500, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> > Recent source-only rebuild for nageru has mulitple FTBFS architectures on
> > buildd: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=nageru
> >
> > The tail log all reads
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 12:50:43AM -0500, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Recent source-only rebuild for nageru has mulitple FTBFS architectures on
> buildd: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=nageru
>
> The tail log all reads like this:
It looks like the definition of GLsizeiptr is different
Package: nageru
Severity: serious
Version: 1.9.1-1.1
Recent source-only rebuild for nageru has mulitple FTBFS architectures on
buildd: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=nageru
The tail log all reads like this:
/usr/bin/ld: libcore.a(nageru_timecode_renderer.cpp.o): in function
4 matches
Mail list logo
