On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 08:51:08PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Hilko,
>
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 12:57:27AM +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> > * Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> >
> > >> FTR, this was as well raised back in [1]. AFAIK there was no direct
> > >> feedback to the question from Moritz b
Hi Hilko,
On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 12:57:27AM +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> * Moritz Mühlenhoff:
>
> >> FTR, this was as well raised back in [1]. AFAIK there was no direct
> >> feedback to the question from Moritz back then.
> >
> > Yeah, we should at least remove radare2 from oldstable (IIRC for
>
* Moritz Mühlenhoff:
>> FTR, this was as well raised back in [1]. AFAIK there was no direct
>> feedback to the question from Moritz back then.
>
> Yeah, we should at least remove radare2 from oldstable (IIRC for
> buster there's an rdep which prevents that)
That reverse dependency is radare2-cutt
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:10:38PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:59:05PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Source: radare2
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: security
> >
> > It is understandable (and normal for most software) that upstream
> > is not able or will
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:59:05PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: radare2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> It is understandable (and normal for most software) that upstream
> is not able or willing to provide security support for the old
> version shipped in stable distribution rel
Source: radare2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
It is understandable (and normal for most software) that upstream
is not able or willing to provide security support for the old
version shipped in stable distribution releases.
But below seems to be upstream actively encouraging exploiting
the versi
6 matches
Mail list logo
