Holger Levsen wrote on Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:40 +00:00:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:04:48AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Here you go:
> [...]
>
> thanks, looks good to me now!
Great, thanks for the quick turnaround!
I'm building this now for buster and will update my local scripts to use
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:04:48AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Here you go:
[...]
thanks, looks good to me now!
> (Normally I'd add an interdiff alongside the new diff, but I'll skip
> that since you said you only skimmed the original.)
:)
> P.S. Separate issue: in cases such
> > > > I'm not sure if the handling of the ":amd64" architecture suffixes is
> > > > ideal. Thoughts?
> > Okay, so what would you prefer? To have --except=foo match both
> > foo and foo:bar for any value of bar? (and 'foo' documented as
> > a bare package name without a ":arch" suffix)
>
>
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:50:46AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Thanks for the review!
well, I only glimpsed over it so far..
> > why is php5 mentioned here?
> I based the new test on the existing "simple ($awk)" test. That test
> uses php5 as the example, so that carried over to
Holger Levsen wrote on Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:26 +00:00:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 07:35:39PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > & patches welcome.
> > Here you go, against current git:
>
> wheeehoo, very nice.
>
Thanks for the review!
> just two comments:
>
> > +write_file ($list_limited,
Hi Daniel,
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 07:35:39PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > & patches welcome.
> Here you go, against current git:
wheeehoo, very nice.
just two comments:
> +write_file ($list_limited, <<__EOS__);
> +php5See README.Debian.security for the PHP security policy
>
Controls: tags -1 confirmed patch
Holger Levsen wrote on Sun, 16 Feb 2020 18:29 +:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 04:12:46PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > [...] Thus, in effect, it would let the admin "whitelist"
> > known issues, so only new ones would be printed.
> >
> > Would this make
Hi Daniel,
thanks for your bug report.
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 04:12:46PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> [...] Thus, in effect, it would let the admin "whitelist"
> known issues, so only new ones would be printed.
>
> Would this make sense?
yes.
& patches welcome.
--
cheers,
Holger
Package: debian-security-support
Version: 2019.12.12~deb10u1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Two things:
1. I have installed binutils, which is Build-Essential and has limited
security support (#948634).
2. I use «chronic -e sh -c
9 matches
Mail list logo
