> Was this patch just a result of general QA activity or is there some
> program you are trying to package?
Yes, this patch is for QA. I assumed there are important packages that rely
on this abandoned crate, hence the workaround. Otherwise removing it from
Debian seems a better choice.
I have written a merge request [1] to fix FTBFS on all platforms. Tested on my
dev machine on amd64 and riscv64. If more helps are needed, please let me know.
Thanks for the patch,
Was this patch just a result of general QA activity or is there some
program you are trying to package?
We can f
tags 952159 + patch
thanks
Hello Lucas and Maintainers,
I have written a merge request [1] to fix FTBFS on all platforms. Tested on my
dev machine on amd64 and riscv64. If more helps are needed, please let me know.
Cheers,
Eric
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo-conf/-/merge_reque
Source: rust-nodrop-union
Version: 0.1.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
4 matches
Mail list logo