Hi Harald,
Thanks for comprehensive account of the job flow - all worked as expected now.
Interestingly, I originally assumed it was a bug due to observed discrepancy
with bash...
On 29/03/2020 23:07, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> I agree that the change is incorrect, but I do not agree that this
Hi Vitaly,
On 31/03/2020 20:07, Vitaly Zuevsky wrote:
I must have confused two concepts: waited process in OS -vs- waited job inside
shell interpreter. I am trying to see how it work in practice:
# true & false &
#
[2] + Done(1)false
[1] + Done true
#
Hi Harald,
> set -- $(seq 1 100)
> for i
> do
> : &
> sleep .1
> done
> for i
> do
> wait %$i
> done
>
>This is a valid script and works fine in dash. Your change breaks this by not
>keeping the jobs around long enough, and I hope this test script shows that
>there is
On 29/03/2020 23:07, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 08:06:31PM +0100, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On 29/03/2020 18:54, Vitaly Zuevsky wrote:
I have now fixed this bug locally.
The leak is in jobtab array (jobs.c). I concluded that the most
logical approach would be eliminating
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 08:06:31PM +0100, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On 29/03/2020 18:54, Vitaly Zuevsky wrote:
> > I have now fixed this bug locally.
> > The leak is in jobtab array (jobs.c). I concluded that the most
> > logical approach would be eliminating inconsistency between
> > makejob()
Hi Vitaly,
On 29/03/2020 18:54, Vitaly Zuevsky wrote:
I have now fixed this bug locally.
The leak is in jobtab array (jobs.c). I concluded that the most logical
approach would be eliminating inconsistency between makejob() and dowait()
functions. My fix in a forked repo:
I have now fixed this bug locally.
The leak is in jobtab array (jobs.c). I concluded that the most logical
approach would be eliminating inconsistency between makejob() and dowait()
functions. My fix in a forked repo:
: Vitaly Zuevsky; 953...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: Re: Bug#953421: dash: Resident Set Size growth is unbound (memory
leak) on an infinite shell loop
Thanks for your report; this most likely is a bug in the upstream package.
While I doubt it’s any of our patches that in
Hi,
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 17:09, Vitaly Zuevsky wrote:
> [VZ]I use a shell script to supervise processes in a docker/kubernetes
> container. I noticed steady growth
> in the cgroup's CPU utilization from 15 to 35 millicores within 17
> days in absence of any external
>
Package: dash
Version: 0.5.8-2.1ubuntu2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
[VZ]I use a shell script to supervise processes in a docker/kubernetes
container. I noticed
10 matches
Mail list logo
