On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:50:46PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Ivo, Marco,
>
> On 06-04-2021 22:10, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > I ran a number of (partial and full) upgrade tests, and they all seem to
> > work
> > fine. In all cases, libcrypt1 is installed before libc6, and there is no
> >
Hi Marco,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 02:27:10PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 14, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> > The patch looks sensible after reading the discussion in these bugs. Can
> > we have an upload soon to have exposure?
> Unless there are any objections I will do a libxcrypt upload in a
On Apr 14, Paul Gevers wrote:
> The patch looks sensible after reading the discussion in these bugs. Can
> we have an upload soon to have exposure?
Unless there are any objections I will do a libxcrypt upload in a couple
of days.
I think that I can leave the udeb library in /usr/lib/.
--
Hi Ivo, Marco,
On 06-04-2021 22:10, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> I ran a number of (partial and full) upgrade tests, and they all seem to work
> fine. In all cases, libcrypt1 is installed before libc6, and there is no
> intermediate situations where libcrypt.so.1 is missing.
The patch looks sensible
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:52:57PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > > I wonder if all this might be caused by the breaks from libcrypt1 (against
> > > libc6 (<< 2.29-4)). Is there a way to remove the breaks without causing
> > > issues? Maybe this is somewhat similar to the situation in
>
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
