Hi Lucas,
On 26-04-2020 15:14, James McCoy wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:09:35PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I
>> suggest you apply the same fix you already did here [2] and stop
>> building the python package for now if that works.
>
> Done and uploaded, however that now makes mercurial
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:09:35PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I
> suggest you apply the same fix you already did here [2] and stop
> building the python package for now if that works.
Done and uploaded, however that now makes mercurial FTBFS, as I had
notified them earlier this month (#956007).
Hi James,
On 23-04-2020 13:38, James McCoy wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:13:15AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> It seems the ruby2.5 removal transition [1] is stalled by subversion
>> [2]. Can the fix for 954866 please be uploaded to unstable such that
>> subversion can migrate and we can
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:13:15AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> It seems the ruby2.5 removal transition [1] is stalled by subversion
> [2]. Can the fix for 954866 please be uploaded to unstable such that
> subversion can migrate and we can finish the removal of ruby2.5 in testing?
I'd rather not
block 953881 by 954866
thanks
Dear all,
It seems the ruby2.5 removal transition [1] is stalled by subversion
[2]. Can the fix for 954866 please be uploaded to unstable such that
subversion can migrate and we can finish the removal of ruby2.5 in testing?
Paul
[1]
On 23/03/2020 19:58, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 21/03/2020 08:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> And the others as well. There are a few build failures, and ruby-pgplot
>> needs a
>> binary upload on amd64+i386. Could you take care of that and file bugs for
>> the
>> packages that
Hi,
On 21/03/2020 08:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> And the others as well. There are a few build failures, and ruby-pgplot needs
> a
> binary upload on amd64+i386. Could you take care of that and file bugs for the
> packages that failed to build?
Thanks Emilio. Antonio already did a
On 21/03/2020 12:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 19/03/2020 10:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 18/03/2020 22:54, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 17/03/2020 20:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Let's go ahead with this. Let me know when things are ready and I'll start
On 19/03/2020 10:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 18/03/2020 22:54, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 17/03/2020 20:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Let's go ahead with this. Let me know when things are ready and I'll start
>>> with
>>> the binNMUs.
>>
>> ruby-defaults/1:2.7 with
On 18/03/2020 22:54, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 17/03/2020 20:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Let's go ahead with this. Let me know when things are ready and I'll start
>> with
>> the binNMUs.
>
> ruby-defaults/1:2.7 with ruby 2.7 as default just landed in Debian
> unstable [1].
Hi,
On 17/03/2020 20:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Let's go ahead with this. Let me know when things are ready and I'll start
> with
> the binNMUs.
ruby-defaults/1:2.7 with ruby 2.7 as default just landed in Debian
unstable [1]. Could you start with binNMUs now?
[1]
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.5-rm.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 17/03/2020 14:40, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
>
> On 14/03/2020 11:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 14/03/2020 14:16, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
>>> In Ubuntu we used the following ben
On 14/03/2020 11:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 14/03/2020 14:16, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
>> In Ubuntu we used the following ben file [4] to track this part of
>> transition:
>>
>> title = "ruby2.7-only";
>> is_affected = .depends ~ /libruby2/;
>> is_good = .depends ~
On 14/03/2020 14:16, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> Since adding support to ruby2.7 in unstable is mostly done [1][2], I'd like
> to move forward and upload
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
Since adding support to ruby2.7 in unstable is mostly done [1][2], I'd like to
move forward and upload
ruby-defaults/1:2.7~0 with only ruby2.7 from experimental to unstable. Some
15 matches
Mail list logo
