On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 22:35:11 +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> > From: Simon McVittie
> > That's a lot like what I did. I'll recheck soon whether my branch would
> > work with their patch instead of mine.
Yes, their patch is fine. I slightly preferred my version,
but not enough for
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon McVittie
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 5:23 PM
> To: Limonciello, Mario
> Cc: 955...@bugs.debian.org; sub...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#955259: libjcat: Please add consider adding autopkgtest
> coverage
>
>
> [E
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 19:09:23 +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> Upstream the following was recently accepted to allow installed-tests to work
> Without the source tree nearby.
> https://github.com/hughsie/libjcat/commit/d6dc3e90b0c805cc50bff9d1d1b87ff575e53769
That's a lot like what I
0 3:29 PM
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System
> Subject: Bug#955259: libjcat: Please add consider adding autopkgtest
> coverage
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> Source: libjcat
> Version: 0.1.0-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> Control: block -1 by 955258
>
> I n
Source: libjcat
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Control: block -1 by 955258
I noticed that libjcat has GNOME-style installed-tests, which in principle
make it easy to add autopkgtest coverage, so I tried to contribute a
trivial patch to do so. Unfortunately, the installed-tests
5 matches
Mail list logo
