Bug#956260: bkchem: should this package be removed?

2020-05-11 Thread Stuart Prescott
> > What exactly is it blocking? > > It blocks reverse deps from removing their Python 2 packages (or if > Py2-specific the package at large), which in turn block the removal > of other packages. > > In the case of bkchem python-pil and python-pmw, which in turn block > the removal of python-tk.

Bug#956260: [Debichem-devel] Bug#956260: Bug#956260: bkchem: should this package be removed?

2020-05-11 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:51:47AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:22:32AM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > Let's go ahead with removal now? This is blocking progress on lower level > > dependencies. > > What exactly is it blocking? It blocks reverse deps

Bug#956260: [Debichem-devel] Bug#956260: Bug#956260: bkchem: should this package be removed?

2020-05-11 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:22:32AM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Let's go ahead with removal now? This is blocking progress on lower level > dependencies. What exactly is it blocking? Michael

Bug#956260: Bug#956260: bkchem: should this package be removed?

2020-05-10 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 01:38:13PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2020, 08:48 +0200 schrieb Tone Kokalj: > > On 2020-04-09 06:14, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > [..] > > > i think this pacakge should be removed from debian: > > > > > > > > > * python2-only > > > * dead upstream

Bug#956260: [Debichem-devel] Bug#956260: bkchem: should this package be removed?

2020-04-11 Thread Sandro Tosi
> To my opinion, bkchem is the best simple program for drawing chemical > skeletal formulae. > As a chemist I use it all the time. It would really be a pity if it > disappears from Debian. that's good to know and thanks for sharing this. The situation is that every major Linux distributions are

Bug#956260: Bug#956260: bkchem: should this package be removed?

2020-04-09 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2020, 08:48 +0200 schrieb Tone Kokalj: > On 2020-04-09 06:14, Sandro Tosi wrote: [..] > > i think this pacakge should be removed from debian: > > > > > > * python2-only > > * dead upstream (last release in 2010) > > * relatively low pop-con > > * keeps in the archive at

Bug#956260: [Debichem-devel] Bug#956260: bkchem: should this package be removed?

2020-04-09 Thread Tone Kokalj
On 2020-04-09 06:14, Sandro Tosi wrote: Package: bkchem Severity: serious Tags: bullseye, sid Hello, i think this pacakge should be removed from debian: * python2-only * dead upstream (last release in 2010) * relatively low pop-con * keeps in the archive at least 1 package that could be

Bug#956260: bkchem: should this package be removed?

2020-04-08 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: bkchem Severity: serious Tags: bullseye, sid Hello, i think this pacakge should be removed from debian: * python2-only * dead upstream (last release in 2010) * relatively low pop-con * keeps in the archive at least 1 package that could be removed if we remove bkchem if I dont