reassign 956848 t-coffee 13.41.0.28bdc39+dfsg-1
retitle 956848 t-coffee: should use "example" blastpgp.pl
retitle 956850 ncbi-blast+: Please provide /usr/bin/legacy_blast.pl
thanks
Andreas Tille writes:
> Thanks again. Applied an pushed. Please feel free to directly
> commit to Git. I don't
Thanks again. Applied an pushed. Please feel free to directly
commit to Git. I don't see any advantage to communicate via
BTW. :-)
Kind regards, Andreas.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 01:06:42PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> "Aaron M. Ucko" writes:
>
> > I've attached a full patch.
>
> Extended
Hi Aaron,
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:52:40AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> I've attached a full patch.
thanks a lot. Patch commited to Git.
The test suite runs fine. I admit I crafted the patch to let the test
suite of python-cogent pass. This software has changed severely so I do
not have
"Aaron M. Ucko" writes:
> I've attached a full patch.
Extended to cover calls to blastall, which is also a legacy entry point.
(I left blast_msa_old's call as is, since it's untranslatable without
the crucial -p argument, and nothing calls that subroutine anyway.)
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC
Andreas Tille writes:
> However, besides t-coffee I think that are probably more
> tools around which are expecting the .pl extensions on those prominent
> tools from ncbi-blast.
Perhaps, but please bear in mind that ncbi-blast+ primarily ships
compiled C++ binaries and blast2 historically
Hi Aaron,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 06:58:12PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
>
> I'm open to making these changes if necessary, particularly given that
> this directive is merely a "should" and that there's a fair bit of
> precedent for violating it. (Also, ncbi-blast+ will need a new upload
>
Andreas Tille writes:
> I'm aware that language extensions in Debian are not conform to
> policy. However, as we discussed in
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2018/06/msg00043.html
>
> only stripping the extension is sometimes hard for rdepends of
> our packages. In this case the lack
Package: ncbi-blast+-legacy
Version: 2.9.0-4
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm aware that language extensions in Debian are not conform to
policy. However, as we discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2018/06/msg00043.html
only stripping the extension is sometimes hard for rdepends of
our
8 matches
Mail list logo
