Bug#958343: /usr/bin/dh_installman: dh_installman doesn't fall back to using file extension when .TH line is incorrect

2020-04-24 Thread Niels Thykier
Paul Gevers: > Hi Niels, > > On 24-04-2020 20:23, Niels Thykier wrote:> Devil is in the detail. The > .TH/.Dt line is incorrect but not >> "incorrect enough" for dh_installman to ignore it. The version number >> is treated as a section "0.15.0" which the "real" section (the X in >> /usr/share/ma

Bug#958343: /usr/bin/dh_installman: dh_installman doesn't fall back to using file extension when .TH line is incorrect

2020-04-24 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Niels, On 24-04-2020 20:23, Niels Thykier wrote:> Devil is in the detail. The .TH/.Dt line is incorrect but not > "incorrect enough" for dh_installman to ignore it. The version number > is treated as a section "0.15.0" which the "real" section (the X in > /usr/share/man/manX/foo.X.gz) as 0. >

Bug#958343: /usr/bin/dh_installman: dh_installman doesn't fall back to using file extension when .TH line is incorrect

2020-04-24 Thread Niels Thykier
Paul Gevers: > Package: debhelper > Version: 12.10 > Severity: normal > File: /usr/bin/dh_installman > > Dear Maintainers, Niels, > > Recently pasdoc started to FTBFS (bug #954676) for what is apparently a > change in the output of help2man. However, I think it shouldn't FTBFS on > that, as the d

Bug#958343: /usr/bin/dh_installman: dh_installman doesn't fall back to using file extension when .TH line is incorrect

2020-04-20 Thread Paul Gevers
Package: debhelper Version: 12.10 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/dh_installman Dear Maintainers, Niels, Recently pasdoc started to FTBFS (bug #954676) for what is apparently a change in the output of help2man. However, I think it shouldn't FTBFS on that, as the documentation of dh_installman rea