Bug#958489: buster-pu: package fuse/2.9.9-1+deb10u1

2020-05-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Adam D. Barratt (2020-04-26): > Similarly to fuse3, this wants a KiBi-ack for completeness. No objections, thanks. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description: PGP

Bug#958489: buster-pu: package fuse/2.9.9-1+deb10u1

2020-04-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + d-i On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 19:16 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 22:56 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: > > There are two RC bugs fixed in fuse for Bullseye but not yet for > > Buster. > > First one[1] and its variant[2]

Bug#958489: buster-pu: package fuse/2.9.9-1+deb10u1

2020-04-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 22:56 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: > There are two RC bugs fixed in fuse for Bullseye but not yet for > Buster. > First one[1] and its variant[2] are caused by a leftover in postinst > - > udev has rules now to handle such things in its

Bug#958489: buster-pu: package fuse/2.9.9-1+deb10u1

2020-04-22 Thread GCS
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi SRMs, There are two RC bugs fixed in fuse for Bullseye but not yet for Buster. First one[1] and its variant[2] are caused by a leftover in postinst - udev has rules now to