Hi,
Adam D. Barratt (2020-04-26):
> I missed (again) that the package generates a udeb. I don't think d-i
> actually uses it, but it should have a KiBi-ack for completeness. (A
> statement that fuse is OK to update in general would also work if
> that's easier.)
Looking at unstable, checking
Control: tags -1 + d-i
On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 19:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 22:56 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > There are two RC bugs fixed in fuse3 for Bullseye but not yet for
> > Buster.
> > First one[1] is caused by a
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 22:56 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> There are two RC bugs fixed in fuse3 for Bullseye but not yet for
> Buster.
> First one[1] is caused by a leftover in postinst - udev has rules now
> to handle such things in its 50-udev-default.rules and
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi SRMs,
There are two RC bugs fixed in fuse3 for Bullseye but not yet for Buster.
First one[1] is caused by a leftover in postinst - udev has rules now
to handle such things in
4 matches
Mail list logo
