Bug#958666: New lintian warning: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure Debian Med Packaging Team

2020-05-03 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:52:22AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : > >https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/resfinder/ > > Both versions *.pl and *.py remain in source and it took me a long > time to get an answer from upstream / our users what is really used > and what should be packaged. See

Bug#958666: New lintian warning: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure Debian Med Packaging Team

2020-04-27 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 04:28:03PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > a single example which I personally experienced and had to discussed > > with upstream which one is the right one to distribute. I do not > > remember the software but if you really want to know I check my > > mailbox on Monday.

Bug#958666: New lintian warning: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure Debian Med Packaging Team

2020-04-24 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi, On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:24 AM Chris Lamb wrote: > > in order to spare this boilerplate within the Med team. Wouldn't it be better to lower the severity for scripts shipped by upstream (vs the maintainer)? Kind regards Felix Lechner

Bug#958666: New lintian warning: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure Debian Med Packaging Team

2020-04-24 Thread Chris Lamb
[replacing lintian-ma...@debian.org → 958...@bugs.debian.org] Andreas Tille wrote: > > This was already done in: […] > Not really (as Gregor pointed out since Info is also on the radar). I've just marked the tag as "experimental". This has the same practical effect of it being removed. > To