Bug#960143: sagetex: FTBFS in unstable

2020-05-14 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi John, > There are strange discrepancies in the tar files and one upload was > rejected. I will retry. I manually built a package and worked around the checksum discrepancies, package is now accepted into unstable. Norbert -- PREINING Norbert

Bug#960143: sagetex: FTBFS in unstable

2020-05-14 Thread Norbert Preining
> > Uploading in the a few minutes, after the binary build succeeded. > > Just a ping in case you've moved on There are strange discrepancies in the tar files and one upload was rejected. I will retry. Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info

Bug#960143: sagetex: FTBFS in unstable

2020-05-14 Thread John Scott
On Mon, 11 May 2020 19:57:52 +0900 Norbert Preining wrote: > Uploading in the a few minutes, after the binary build succeeded. Just a ping in case you've moved on signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#960143: sagetex: FTBFS in unstable

2020-05-11 Thread Norbert Preining
> Please can someone make a team upload as my Debian key is expired Uploading in the a few minutes, after the binary build succeeded. Thanks Norbert -- PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian

Bug#960143: sagetex: FTBFS in unstable

2020-05-11 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello, I have just pushed a fix at Salsa. Please can someone make a team upload as my Debian key is expired (I did not send keyring.debian.org in due time, my mistake). Thanks in adavance, Jerome On 11/05/2020 10:30, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Am 11.05.2020 um 00:21 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: > > Hi,

Bug#960143: sagetex: FTBFS in unstable

2020-05-11 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Again, I am on my way to push a fix at Salsa. Jerome On 11/05/2020 10:30, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Am 11.05.2020 um 00:21 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: > > Hi, > >> - tkz-berge.sty does not exist in Debian any more. >> > Simply replacing tkz-berge.sty by tkz-base.sty does not solve the issue.

Bug#960143: sagetex: FTBFS in unstable

2020-05-11 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello, On 11/05/2020 10:30, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Am 11.05.2020 um 00:21 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: > > Hi, > >> - tkz-berge.sty does not exist in Debian any more. We can read at https://ctan.org/pkg/tkz-berge?lang=en This package has been taken temporarily out of circulation to give the

Bug#960143: sagetex: FTBFS in unstable

2020-05-11 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 11.05.2020 um 00:21 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit: Hi, > - tkz-berge.sty does not exist in Debian any more. > Simply replacing tkz-berge.sty by tkz-base.sty does not solve the issue. Leaving out debianization-examples.patch at least solves the issue. > - you need to declare a BD on sagetex

Bug#960143: sagetex: FTBFS in unstable

2020-05-10 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mon, 11 May 2020, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > - tkz-berge.sty does not exist in Debian any more. commit 2f6b882099bed8fbee175a68cea9e6f27d03462e Author: Karl Berry Date: Mon Mar 9 21:17:09 2020 + rm tkz-berge, obsolete on ctan git-svn-id: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk@54205

Bug#960143: sagetex: FTBFS in unstable

2020-05-10 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 10.05.2020 um 14:06 teilte Jerome BENOIT mit: > On 10/05/2020 14:06, Hilmar Preuße wrote: >> Am 10.05.2020 um 08:46 teilte Jerome BENOIT mit: Hi, >>> Hello Graham, thanks for the report. >>> It sounds a Depends issue. >>> >> I guess some style files moved to another Debian package and hence

Bug#960143: sagetex: FTBFS in unstable

2020-05-10 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Hilmar, On 10/05/2020 14:06, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Am 10.05.2020 um 08:46 teilte Jerome BENOIT mit: > > Hi Jerome, > >> Hello Graham, thanks for the report. >> It sounds a Depends issue. >> > I guess some style files moved to another Debian package and hence they > are missing now. I

Bug#960143: sagetex: FTBFS in unstable

2020-05-10 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 10.05.2020 um 08:46 teilte Jerome BENOIT mit: Hi Jerome, > Hello Graham, thanks for the report. > It sounds a Depends issue. > I guess some style files moved to another Debian package and hence they are missing now. Do you need help by fixing the issue? Hilmar -- sigfault #206401

Bug#960143: sagetex: FTBFS in unstable

2020-05-10 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Graham, thanks for the report. It sounds a Depends issue. I will fix it as soon as my extended key reaches the Debian keyring. Best, Jerome On 10/05/2020 01:01, Graham Inggs wrote: > Source: sagetex > Version: 3.4+ds-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > Hi Maintainer > > Sagetex

Bug#960143: sagetex: FTBFS in unstable

2020-05-09 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: sagetex Version: 3.4+ds-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi Maintainer Sagetex currently FTBFS in unstable [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/sagetex.html kpathsea: