On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 2:53 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2020-06-01 12:40:32, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > @Sebastian: As I see, that's finished for some time now.
>
> Indeed, so please go ahead with upload of icu to unstable. I will binNMU
> boost1.71 immediately and once those are done
Hi László, Giovanni,
On 2020-06-01 12:40:32, László Böszörményi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 12:24 PM Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> > Il 23/05/20 15:43, Sebastian Ramacher ha scritto:
> > > The tracker is now available at
> > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.71.html. If
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 12:24 PM Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Il 23/05/20 15:43, Sebastian Ramacher ha scritto:
> > The tracker is now available at
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.71.html. If there are
> > no other major issues, I think we can start this after the r-api-4.0
Hi,
Il 23/05/20 15:43, Sebastian Ramacher ha scritto:
> The tracker is now available at
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.71.html. If there are
> no other major issues, I think we can start this after the r-api-4.0
> (#955211) transition finished.
That's ok for me. Most of the
On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 13:26, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:59:07PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 12:34, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 03:40:43PM +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Level 1.5 is needed
Hi Giovanni
On 2020-05-12 16:15:01 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 2020-05-12 11:27:32 +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> > Il 12/05/20 10:05, Sebastian Ramacher ha scritto:
> > > I can help with filing those bugs so we can get that transition ready.
> >
> > Thanks. According to
Hi
On 2020-05-12 11:27:32 +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Il 12/05/20 10:05, Sebastian Ramacher ha scritto:
> > I can help with filing those bugs so we can get that transition ready.
>
> Thanks. According to my notes, the packages that fail to build with 1.71
> (and do not fail with 1.67)
Hi,
Il 12/05/20 10:05, Sebastian Ramacher ha scritto:
> I can help with filing those bugs so we can get that transition ready.
Thanks. According to my notes, the packages that fail to build with 1.71
(and do not fail with 1.67) that still require bug filing are these:
cupt
dds
ecflow
facter
On 2020-05-11 14:39:50 +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Il 11/05/20 14:26, Adrian Bunk ha scritto:
> > Is there a good reason why the boost 1.67 -> 1.71 transition has already
> > happened in Ubuntu but not yet in Debian?
>
> The reason I know about is that I am the only person working on it
Hi,
Il 11/05/20 14:26, Adrian Bunk ha scritto:
> Is there a good reason why the boost 1.67 -> 1.71 transition has already
> happened in Ubuntu but not yet in Debian?
The reason I know about is that I am the only person working on it at
the moment, and I don't have much time myself. I am filing
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:59:07PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 12:34, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 03:40:43PM +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > >
> > > Level 1.5 is needed for Boost packages to be binNMUed:
> > > Both boost1.67 and
On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 12:59, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> If icu in unstable could add Breaks: libbost-regex1.67-0 (<<
> 1.67.0-141) that should be sufficient to ensure upgrades happen the
should read (<< 1.67.0-14~)
On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 12:34, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 03:40:43PM +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> >
> > Level 1.5 is needed for Boost packages to be binNMUed:
> > Both boost1.67 and boost1.71 build correctly.
> >...
>
> Changing the icu version changes the
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 03:40:43PM +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
>
> Level 1.5 is needed for Boost packages to be binNMUed:
> Both boost1.67 and boost1.71 build correctly.
>...
Changing the icu version changes the libboost_regex ABI.
The libboost-regex*-icu* provides untangle icu
Control: block -1 by 960236 960239 690240 690242 690243 960237 955114
On 2020-05-10 18:15:57 +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 4:09 PM Sebastian Ramacher
> wrote:
> > On 2020-05-10 15:40:43 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > Have bugs been
Hi Sebastian,
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 4:09 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2020-05-10 15:40:43 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> Have bugs been filed for those build issues?
Not yet - forgot to ask if I should do it immediately. It seems clear
Chromium will not make it in time (as noted it's
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi László
On 2020-05-10 15:40:43 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi RMs,
Quite a big transition of ICU I would like to start.
The build test is done on amd64 only and has the following FTBFS reasons.
Level 1:
casparcg-server: linking problem with
18 matches
Mail list logo
