Bug#961378: -v causes Temporary failure in name resolution

2020-05-24 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
Sure, now that I am online, I have a working resolver. But not when I made the report. I was offline. Anyway it is 100% the fault of the program for not having been tested offline without a resolver running.

Bug#961378: -v causes Temporary failure in name resolution

2020-05-23 Thread Guilhem Moulin
On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 01:38:14 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > That error should probably not be fatal FTR that's in report_sock(). -- Guilhem. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#961378: -v causes Temporary failure in name resolution

2020-05-23 Thread Guilhem Moulin
Control: retitle -1 -v yields fatal name resolution errors Control: tag -1 upstream On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 18:33:38 +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > $ nc -v -l -p 60111 > nc: getnameinfo: Temporary failure in name resolution Do you have a working resolver on that host? I can't reproduce this with a

Bug#961378: -v causes Temporary failure in name resolution

2020-05-23 Thread Dan Jacobson
Package: netcat-openbsd Version: 1.206-1 File: /bin/nc.openbsd $ man nc -v Produce more verbose output. but $ nc -v -l -p 60111 nc: getnameinfo: Temporary failure in name resolution and it dies. That's crazy. $ nc.traditional -v -l -p 60111 listening on [any] 60111 ... That's better.