Dylan,
On 29 May 2020 at 08:03, Dylan Aïssi wrote:
| Hi Dirk,
|
| Le jeu. 28 mai 2020 à 18:03, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
| >
| > OTOH the way we implement the tag doesn't it get added automagically by the
| > r-base-core package when constructing an r-{cran,bioc,...}-* package?
| >
|
|
Hi Dirk,
Le jeu. 28 mai 2020 à 18:03, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
>
> OTOH the way we implement the tag doesn't it get added automagically by the
> r-base-core package when constructing an r-{cran,bioc,...}-* package?
>
Yes, it is.
But, in one week I found by chance two packages
On 28 May 2020 at 10:10, Dylan Aïssi wrote:
| Package: lintian
| Version: 2.77.1
| Severity: wishlist
| X-Debbugs-CC: debia...@lists.debian.org
|
| Hi,
|
| I just saw a R binary package (r-cran-isospec) with wrong dependencies
| (bug not yet opened). Lintian doesn't warn about a problem in its
Hi Dylan,
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:10:54AM +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.77.1
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-CC: debia...@lists.debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I just saw a R binary package (r-cran-isospec) with wrong dependencies
> (bug not yet opened). Lintian doesn't
Hi,
Le jeu. 28 mai 2020 à 10:15, Dylan Aïssi a écrit :
>
> I just saw a R binary package (r-cran-isospec) with wrong dependencies
>
Some days ago, I found another package with similar bug (r-bioc-mofa).
Already fixed in unstable but the version in testing has wrong
dependencies. This tag will
Package: lintian
Version: 2.77.1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debia...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I just saw a R binary package (r-cran-isospec) with wrong dependencies
(bug not yet opened). Lintian doesn't warn about a problem in its
dependencies, so it would be cool to add a new warning (maybe
6 matches
Mail list logo
